I was in the meeting for quite a long time, so unlike other times I wrote out my speaking notes in detail beforehand. I still had time, so I ran through them and realized they were too long. Below, for what it's worth, is the notes for what I said and also the notes for what I wanted to say at somewhat greater length:
Short version:
We support the staff recs bc hab plan buys both
environmental mitigation and environmental enhancement in bulk wholesale amounts.
A significant improvement in the draft Habitat Plan is that
it has been changed to reflect the policies in San Jose’s draft General Plan
proposed by its Task Force. The changes
assume that both South Almaden Valley and mid-Coyote Valley will remain mostly
undeveloped, significantly reducing the habitat mitigation costs in the Habitat
Plan.
But there’s another part of the Draft General Plan that
needs further incorporation in the Habitat Plan.
ER-7.5 Support the on-going identification and protection of critical
linkages for wildlife movement in the Mid-Coyote Valley.
Nothing in the Habitat Plan has been changed to reflect this
important new component of the City’s Draft General Plan
I believe that staff think it is as of yet unclear what this
new Draft General Plan policy will mean for San Jose. One thing I believe you can do that can be
helpful is to communicate to staff that you believe this General Plan policy
recommended to you by your Task Force is one that you support, and that the
Habitat Plan should identify opportunities to protect wildlife movement in
mid-Coyote Valley, especially because there are opportunities for outside
funding that will not cost San Jose a dime while still helping to promote a San
Jose policy.
These type of technical issues and improvements can still
occur with little financial effects over the next few months, and we look
forward to working staff and the City Council
Long version:
We support the staff recs bc hab plan buys both
environmental mitigation and environmental enhancement in bulk wholesale
amounts. Not doing the plan doesn’t mean
these costs go away, it simply means that you buy the mitigation and
enhancement on a piecemeal basis for retail costs. This appears to explain the difference
between on the one hand, businesses like the two largest developers in Gilroy
who strongly support the Habitat Plan, and on the other hand, other business
groups with little economic interests one way or another who instead are
motivated based on their ideology.
While we have some concerns about the changes in the Habitat
Plan in recent months, we want to acknowledge some significant
improvements. For example, the draft
Habitat Plan has been changed to reflect the policies in San Jose’s draft
General Plan proposed by its Envision 2040 Task Force, with everyone
acknowledging this is pending the final decisionmaking by the City
Council. The changes assume that both
South Almaden Valley and mid-Coyote Valley will remain mostly undeveloped,
significantly reducing the habitat mitigation costs in the Habitat Plan.
There’s another part of the Draft General Plan that needs
further incorporation in the Habitat Plan.
ER-7.5 Support the on-going identification and protection of critical
linkages for wildlife movement in the Mid-Coyote Valley.
Nothing in the Habitat Plan has been changed to reflect this
important new component of the City’s Draft General Plan
I believe that staff think it is as of yet unclear what this
new Draft General Plan policy will mean for San Jose. One thing I believe you can do that can be
helpful is to communicate to staff that you believe this General Plan policy
recommended to you by your Task Force is one that you support, and that the
Habitat Plan should identify opportunities to protect wildlife movement in
mid-Coyote Valley, especially because there are opportunities for outside
funding that will not cost San Jose a dime while still helping to promote a San
Jose policy.
These type of technical issues and improvements can still
occur with little financial effects over the next few months, and we look
forward to working staff and the City Council
No comments:
Post a Comment